The arrest of Maureen Badejo is not the silencing of a critic. It is the long, slow, and inevitable closing of a chapter written in defiance of truth, paid for with hubris, and sealed by the law.
For years, she operated in a theatre of her own making. The script was compelling: the lone, brave whistleblower against powerful "men of God." The stage was the internet, where outrage is currency. Her lines were grave, resounding claims: "I have evidence!" she declared, not once, but as a recurring chorus. She promised exposés, she promised tapes, she promised documents that would shatter ministries. The audience, a segment of the public hungry for scandal, leaned in.
But in this theatre, the curtain never rose on the promised evidence. The tapes never played. The documents never materialized. The "evidence" remained a phantom, invoked only to justify the next accusation, the next headline, the next wave of fury. It was a performance sustained solely by the audacity of the claim itself.
While the online spectacle raged, a quieter, more profound drama was unfolding in the halls of justice. Dr. Olukoya did not just post a rebuttal video; he took the path of the defamed: the courtroom. And there, stripped of the sound bites and the algorithms, under the harsh light of law and evidence, Maureen Badejo's theatre collapsed.
The UK court did not merely rule against her; it quantified the damage of her lies: £100,000. The Nigerian court did not merely ask her to stop; it imposed a staggering cost for the poison: N500,000,000. These were not fines; they were legal verdicts on the veracity of her claims. She lost. Conclusively.
Yet, in a breathtaking display of contempt, she treated these judgments as mere dialogue in her ongoing drama. She defied the court's order to stop. She did not pay the penalties. She believed, perhaps, that the online theatre was a sovereign state, immune to the laws of man. She confused trending with triumph, hashtags with habeas corpus.
Her arrest today is the final scene of that delusion. It is the moment the real world, the world of consequences, of orders that must be obeyed, and of judgments that must be respected, finally walked onto her stage and turned off the lights.
This is not about religion. It is about accountability. It is about the dangerous, corrosive idea that one can weaponize lies into a career, destroy reputations with phantom evidence, and then ignore the solemn judgments of constituted authorities.
The silence that now surrounds her is deafening. It is the silence where the echoes of her unsubstantiated claims—"I have evidence! I have evidence!"—finally fade into nothing, leaving only the enduring, solemn sound of the gavel that has spoken, twice, against her.
Let this be a lesson, etched in the cold, hard stone of legal outcome: The internet may be a fire, but truth is the ocean. And the waves of justice, though they may roll in slowly, always arrive at the shore. For Maureen Badejo, the tide has finally come in, and it has washed away the last grains of her crumbling stage. The performance is over. The reckoning has begun.
This is the time for anyone Maureen Badejo has blackmailed to rise and use this opportunity to sue her in Nigeria .
Samuel Kayode Jolaosho
0 Comments